Breaking Trump ADMITS HE LIED UNDER OATH Judge REACTS…..

Federal judges across the U.S. are increasingly frustrated with the Trump administration for not following court orders in immigration cases.

In many instances, judges ordered specific actions—like releasing detainees—but the administration either delayed or acted differently.

Judges are now considering contempt of court, which is a serious but rarely used power, showing how far tensions have escalated.

At the same time, in a separate New York civil fraud case, a judge made unusually strong findings about Donald Trump’s credibility.

The judge stated that Trump’s testimony under oath was “hollow and untrue” and found him generally not credible during the trial.

This was not a one-time issue—the judge said Trump often avoided direct answers and gave irrelevant responses.

An appeals court later upheld these credibility concerns.
The case also revealed contradictions in Trump’s sworn statements.

In one instance, he claimed he had stepped away from his company, while in another, he said he never stopped being its president.

Such contradictions can raise legal risks, including potential perjury concerns.

Overall, the key takeaway is this: when courts formally question someone’s honesty under oath, it has lasting consequences.

It affects how future judges, lawyers, and juries treat their statements—and can weaken their position in any legal case going forward.