No One Above the Law — and No One Below Due Process

In every generation, a nation is tested not by how it treats the powerful but by how it treats the powerless.

The phrase “No one is above the law” has become a rallying cry in moments of political turmoil.

It trends.

It echoes through courtrooms. It fuels headlines.

But there is a second half to justice that is too often whispered instead of declared:

No one is below due process.

These two principles are not rivals. They are twins. And when we defend one without the other, we weaken both.

Justice Is Not a Weapon

The rule of law is not designed to be a sword for our side and a shield against accountability.

It is meant to be a scale balanced, impartial, steady even when emotions are not.

When someone powerful is accused of wrongdoing, accountability is essential.

A society that allows wealth, influence, or political position to override justice corrodes from the top down.

But when someone unpopular or politically inconvenient is denied fair treatment, rushed through judgment, or presumed guilty before evidence is weighed, the corrosion spreads from the bottom up.

And corrosion, no matter where it begins, eventually reaches everyone.

Due Process Is Not a Technicality

Due process is often dismissed as a loophole.

A delay tactic.

A frustrating obstacle to swift punishment.

It is none of those things.

Due process is the firewall between a free society and mob rule. It ensures:

Evidence is tested.

Accusations are challenged.

Rights are preserved.

Power is restrained.

It protects the innocent from wrongful punishment and protects the guilty from unlawful punishment.

Both matter.

Because justice is not about vengeance. It is about legitimacy.

Without due process, the law becomes noise. With it, the law becomes trust.

The Temptation of Selective Justice

In polarized times, it is tempting to apply principles selectively.

When our opponents are investigated, we chant, “No one is above the law.”

When our allies are accused, we cry,

“This is a witch hunt.”

But principles are not principles if they only apply to people we dislike.

If we truly believe no one is above the law, we must also believe no one is beneath its protections.

Justice cannot depend on party affiliation.
Or wealth.
Or race.
Or status.
Or whether the accused is trending on social media.

If it does, it is no longer justice it is power.

Why This Moment Matters

History shows that once a society begins bending legal standards for convenience, it rarely bends them back.

Shortcuts taken today become precedents tomorrow.

Procedural rights denied to “them” become unavailable to “us.”

When due process erodes, it does not collapse dramatically.

It fades gradually until one day, people realize the system no longer protects anyone equally.

And by then, it is too late.

—

The Standard We Must Defend

A healthy democracy demands two commitments at the same time:

1. Relentless accountability no exceptions for the powerful.

2. Uncompromising fairness no shortcuts against the accused.

These commitments are not contradictions.

They are the foundation of legitimacy.

The law must be strong enough to confront power.

And restrained enough to protect rights.

Anything less invites chaos dressed as justice.

The Real Test of Character

It is easy to defend due process when it protects someone we admire.

It is harder when it protects someone we oppose.

It is easy to demand accountability for our rivals.

It is harder when it touches our allies.

But the rule of law is not measured in easy moments.

It is measured in the uncomfortable ones.

A society that believes no one is above the law but forgets that no one is below due process will eventually find that law itself has become unstable.

And when law becomes unstable, freedom follows.

The future of justice depends not on which side wins but on whether we are courageous enough to defend the entire principle.

Not half of it.

All of it.